FACTC Blog

The FACTC Blog provides faculty a forum for diverse views on instructional issues related to community and technical colleges in Washington state. For information about FACTC (factc.org), contact Phil Venditti, Clover Park Community College, at phil.venditti@cptc.edu. For information about the FACTC Blog, contact Jennifer Wu, North Seattle Community College at jwu@sccd.ctc.edu. We welcome your feedback and ideas.

Nov 7, 2006

Common Course Numbering: Pros and Cons

The Faculty Association of Community and Technical Colleges (FACTC) would like to provide an open forum for expressing a variety of faculty voices and perspectives.

According to the October 2006 CCN News, Common Course Numbering is “an effort to identify equivalent community and technical college courses and label them with the same Department/Division Abbreviation, Course Number, and Course Title. Common course numbering will NOT require faculty to change or standardize their course content to be equivalent with another colleges’ or impact course delivery methods." You can learn more about the project at the State Board's Common Course Numbering Project website.

Faculty groups at several colleges have expressed viewpoints opposing the CCN plan. Find out more about the faculty's concerns, questions, and their proposed action plan at this Common Course Numbering website.

So, what do you think? Post a comment.

Jennifer Wu
North Seattle Community College

33 Comments:

Anonymous Anonymous said...

My college has been getting its own course numbering system in order the past few years and has been preparing the logistics of this project. I have not heard any complaints from the faculty so far, but I'd say awareness of it is low. The Washington Federation of Teachers has just sent a survey to all the members about this.

The presentation at Tools For Teaching answered all my questions. The number of CTC students who graduate with credits from multiple CTCs was a big argument for this more transparent system for me.

November 08, 2006 3:48 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

While representing DL at today's Enrollment Fair, I had a student approach me and ask why we didn't have this kind of thing in place already.
His issue was multi-faceted based on the fact that the class he needs is not available at North when he needs it. So he wants to easily determine where in WA State (or even farther out) he can find the class elsewhere.

November 09, 2006 5:11 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Let us ge the facts. The CCN news says "Approximately 25 percent of all community and technical college students graduate from a two-year college with credits transferred in from another college." This DOES NOT SAY that these students transfer between community colleges. It includes all students who transfer in. In fact the number that transfer between community colleges is likely to be far less.

However the only numbers available are from the folks who are driving the bus. We need to know where and how these numbers are obtained.

But there is more to this. If this is really directed at the small number of classes touted as being the problem, we are really talking about a far smaller fraction of students. a student who takes a class for interest somewhere, then moves and gets serious about finishing their education contributes to the transfer total, but is unlikely to be involved in the troublesome transfer count. Then too, most courses already have clear descriptions and numbers that while not the same, do not produce confusion.

The system wide cost of this is not trivial and should not be undertaken for a very tiny population. We must have the substantive data for the population that would really be affected and weigh the impact.

November 09, 2006 5:42 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

CCN Does NOT make transfering more transparent. Because this is not supposed to alter curriculum anywhere, transcript evaluators MUST MAKE THE SAME EVALUATION as before. But now we may be calling DIFFERENT OBJECTS BY THE SAME NAME. CCN officials admit that this will happen. How happy will the public be if courses with the SAME NAME are treated differently at different places.

ASK your transcript evaluators how they will behave under the new system. Are there any CCs or TCs from which your school does not accept one of the main-stream English or intro math courses? What about other intro courses? Do you want to begin accepting these credits now now if all that has changed is the name?

If "no" how do you propose to explain to the public why your school does not acept this credit ? Since the public will justifiably howl at this, is it not more likely that your school will buckle and lower the standards? This is one concern that has been raised.

The alternative is that the weaker course is strengthened. This not only is outside the stated scope of CCN but is (I believe) against the main mission of the CC system. We act locally to meet the needs of our service area. The English or math course in the example here is a product of that particular school meeting the needs of its students in the context of their preparation and the programs at that school. There should be no pressure for them to change a course that is serving the needs of their students.

And no pressure for your CC to accept their credit.

This example is not the only mechanism by which CCN will create pressure to alter curriculum. Some deliberation with the list at your school will show you others. Get the list for your college and try it out in a group with several disciplines.

November 10, 2006 1:05 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

It seems to me that homogonizing the wonderfully independent diversity of our "community" colleges is not the most constructive way to help students transfer among institutions.

November 13, 2006 3:56 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

At North Seattle Community College, Sociology 110 (Survey of Sociology)is the first class in Sociology. However, another class entitled "The Global Society" is listed as Sociology 101. This Sociology 101 designation confuses students into thinking it is the first class in Sociology. Therefore, students take the entire course only to find they have not had the introductory Sociology course. The introductory Sociology course is the one required tor specific disciplines. I believe the first course in a discipline should be numbered as 101 to avoid this confusion.

--
Posted by Robert J. Atkins to FACTC Blog at 11/13/2006 12:52:24 PM

November 15, 2006 12:27 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

FYI, the sbctc site address for this has been changed to: http://www.sbctc.ctc.edu/college/e_commoncoursenumbering.aspx

November 16, 2006 11:17 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

In reply to Robert J. Atkins. There are a number of good reasons a discipline might not follow his reasonable suggestion. In the case of physics at BCC, the main sequence for Health Sciences majors starts with 114 (currently) and continues the sequence. If you have had calculus and plan an Engineering career, you take 121 (NOT 114) and follow with this sequence. If you got out of high school without physics or it has been many years you take 106 before either of these, and if you plan to follow an IT associates (non-transfer) degree you take 109 first (and only). How can one reasonably make the FIRST class the lowest number if you serve different populations. This example in not unique to physics or to BCC. Students (and others) want a simple answer but what we do is not simple. ADVISING is the key and there is no replacement for this. A fix that conceals the differences between courses at different colleges (as noted above) is a more dangerous diservice to the public in my opinion.

November 17, 2006 9:51 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Here is another example where CCN interferes with local decision making, taken from physics. Currently BCC uses 114, 115, 116 as course numbers for the algebra based physics sequence (health sciences) and 121, 122, 123 for the calculus based course (physical sciences and engineering). Under CCN, the later sequence would be elevated to 2xx course numbers. Now these two sequences (as taught here) have better than 70% overlap in content - the principle difference being the mathematical sophistication and support in the presentation of this content. To give the 121 sequence a two hundred course designation erroneously suggests that you can (or should) take one then the other if you want to be very well prepared. In fact we advise against this at BCC because they are essentailly the same course. Both are an introductory survey of all the main topics in physics. Also, except in only the most unusual circumstances, other alternatives exist for weak engineering students who want a slower ramp up. However we already have a problem with self advised students who think this is a good plan and waste 15 credits along with the tuition and time delay this implies. The proposed change in course numbering will only encourage this problem.

On the other hand as different schools serve the students in their area, they adjust the coverage and rigor for both of these courses so that system wide there is considerable variation. It is entirely reasonable that at another college the 1xx / 2xx designation between these two sequences is a reasonable one and diminishes errors among students who self advise.

We at BCC do not want either course designated at the 200 level for the reasons stated and because they are both the FIRST YEAR course for their respective audiences. It is unlikely that UW will (or should) match the 2xx designation if they decide to join us later in common numbering BECAUSE these are both first year courses.

However, I would NOT argue against my colleagues at other schools who, for reasons that suit their students, want a 2xx designation at their school. Instead, I say dump this misguided effort.

November 17, 2006 11:08 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

If you have not yet seen it, I would encourage everyone to read the November 17, 2006 letter submitted to the CCN committee by the Northwest Biology Instructors' Organization (NWBIO). It was posted to the NWBIO listserv Nov 18, so you should be able to get a copy from one of your biology faculty folks. This letter identifies many specific reasons why CCN is a bad idea for our students, faculty, programs, and colleges.

I agree with "there_are_better_choices". There are other ways for CTCs to respond to Substitutute HB 2382 that don't involve throwing babies out with their bathwater.

Before you decide that CCN is benign ("Much Ado About Nothing"), or that the arguments for CCN outweigh the arguments against, please ask, "Why do you suppose the most vocal opponents of CCN (so far, anyway) have been those faculty who teach in the sciences and other programs--faculty who have long advised students toward "transfer by majors" degree plans rather than toward the DTA?"

Also, ask: "Doesn't a state-centralized articulation system based on something other than common course numbers (Google, for example, Maryland, Ohio, Illinois, and Arizona's) still allow disciplines to use common course numbers if they voluntarily choose to use them?"

I have not yet seen the Washington Federation of Teachers survey. How was it sent to members?

November 26, 2006 9:16 AM  
Blogger Jennifer Wu said...

The WFT online survey on Common Course Numbering was distributed to members through local faculty union presidents. Data are still being collected and tabulated. Faculty on some campuses still do not know much about the CCN development.

December 04, 2006 12:31 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

I am not philosophically opposed to the CCN proposition. All other things being equal, this surely is better for the students.

But getting from the current system that has had approximately 30 independent institutions setting their own course numbers and content for thirty-plus years, to a common system will really be like herding cats.

It is NOT just a bookkeeping detail that an administrator in Olympia or for that matter a computer program could easily perform. Content, sequence, lab hours, and many, many other details will become the devil in this project.

There really ought to be subject-specific fora and statewide meetings to accomplish this. If not possible, traveling administrators that interact with faculty at each campus.

I believe that this could be made to work if adequate time and resources were made available to all community colleges by the state board. Lacking that resource, I predict that the bulk of the inevitable confusion, manual looking up, communications with transfer institutions, and student advising will be borne by faculty, staff, and of course students. Do we all really need that?

P.S. I teach the upper levels of transfer coursework in math, engineering, and computer science. Many, many of my students have previous coursework at FOUR YEAR INSTITUTIONS. This will not affect the complexity involved in their achieving a successful and efficient tranfer experience. I can also say that, right or wrong, the University of Washington is particularly selective about WHICH COURSE was taken at WHICH COLLEGE. If you aren't aware of this, just try to read and absorb the info at their Transfer Equivalency Guide:
http://admit.washington.edu/BeforeYouApply/Transfer/Plan/EquivalencyGuide

December 06, 2006 2:53 PM  
Blogger Jennifer Wu said...

George Neal has reposted his comments to the new post Common Course Numbering: The Unsettled Issue (Feb. 5, 2007).

February 06, 2007 9:13 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

dating usa sex for japanese http://loveepicentre.com/testimonials.php dating men who won't commit

January 11, 2013 4:01 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

keyword online dating http://loveepicentre.com/taketour.php transguy dating

January 16, 2013 8:29 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

[url=http://loveepicentre.com/advice.php][img]http://loveepicentre.com/uploades/photos/4.jpg[/img][/url]
personals las vegas dating [url=http://loveepicentre.com/testimonials.php]google alt wife dating[/url] indiana south bend dating
ten newest online dating site [url=http://loveepicentre.com/advice.php]best totally free dating sites[/url] conversation questions for dating relationships
rate online dating websites [url=http://loveepicentre.com]dating affairs[/url] online virtual dating games

January 31, 2013 7:35 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

[url=http://loveepicentre.com/taketour.php][img]http://loveepicentre.com/uploades/photos/6.jpg[/img][/url]
dating pakistan chinese affairs [url=http://loveepicentre.com/taketour.php]asian shemale dating[/url] sex dating in hamilton illinois
dating initial attraction last [url=http://loveepicentre.com/map.php]dating pakistan muslim divorces[/url] business cycle dating committee
best adult australia dating site [url=http://loveepicentre.com/]dating activities in dc[/url] sim girl dating games

February 05, 2013 11:14 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

best keyword software http://buyoem.co.uk/es/information-9/Anti-Spam-Policy tech republic software testing [url=http://buyoem.co.uk/de/category-100-110/Internet?page=5]sentex security software[/url] boolean search software
[url=http://buyoem.co.uk/fr/category-200-208/Outils-de-l-Office]Outils de l'Office - Cheap Legal OEM Software, Software Sale, Download OEM[/url] servoce call dispatch schedule software download
[url=http://buyoem.co.uk/product-31620/Super-Flexible-File-Synchronizer-4-8-MAC][img]http://buyoem.co.uk/image/4.gif[/img][/url]

February 23, 2013 11:53 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

[url=http://redbrickstore.co.uk/products/advair-diskus.htm][img]http://onlinemedistore.com/7.jpg[/img][/url]
hills pharmacy in vicksburg michigan http://redbrickstore.co.uk/products/allopurinol.htm worcester family pharmacy [url=http://redbrickstore.co.uk/categories/anti-fungus.htm]cvs pharmacy dover ohio[/url]
pathmark pharmacy http://redbrickstore.co.uk/products/buspar.htm williams brothers pharmacy [url=http://redbrickstore.co.uk/products/ed-discount-pack-2.htm]ed discount pack 2[/url]
clap your hands and say yeah pharmacy http://redbrickstore.co.uk/products/cordarone.htm medicap pharmacy grand forks [url=http://redbrickstore.co.uk/categories/party-pills.htm]bell plaza pharmacy[/url]
dental compounding pharmacy http://redbrickstore.co.uk/products/sublingual-cialis.htm canadian pharmacy affiliate [url=http://redbrickstore.co.uk/products/cialis.htm]cialis[/url]

March 18, 2013 12:48 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

[url=http://certifiedpharmacy.co.uk/products/kamagra.htm][img]http://onlinemedistore.com/6.jpg[/img][/url]
pharmacy technician re certification http://certifiedpharmacy.co.uk/products/voltaren.htm cvs pharmacy passport photo [url=http://certifiedpharmacy.co.uk/categories/women-s-health.htm]overnight pharmacy san antonio[/url]
specialty pharmacy char http://certifiedpharmacy.co.uk/terms.htm top pharmacy school [url=http://certifiedpharmacy.co.uk/products/viagra-soft-flavoured.htm]viagra soft flavoured[/url]
hughes pharmacy http://certifiedpharmacy.co.uk/products/aciclovir.htm pharmacy christmas reading area [url=http://certifiedpharmacy.co.uk/products/cialis-soft-tabs.htm]rite aid pharmacy drive thru[/url]
cvs pharmacy chandler az http://certifiedpharmacy.co.uk/products/rhinocort.htm vips reviews acmedicalgroup discount refill pharmacy [url=http://certifiedpharmacy.co.uk/products/propranolol.htm]propranolol[/url]

April 07, 2013 12:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

[url=http://fdaapproved.co.uk/products/ampicillin.htm][img]http://onlinemedistore.com/5.jpg[/img][/url]
natural pet pharmacy http://fdaapproved.co.uk/products/hydrochlorothiazide.htm pharmacy manufacturer 3592 [url=http://fdaapproved.co.uk/products/protonix.htm]pharmacy outside us[/url]
online pharmacy fluconazole http://fdaapproved.co.uk/products/altace.htm walgeen pharmacy online [url=http://fdaapproved.co.uk/categories/female-enhancement.htm]female enhancement[/url]
burlington wisconsin pharmacy http://fdaapproved.co.uk/products/kamasutra-contoured-condoms.htm american college pharmacy accreditation [url=http://fdaapproved.co.uk/products/sinemet.htm]pharmacy spiking iv chemotherapy for nursing[/url]
bethesda pharmacy http://fdaapproved.co.uk/products/imodium.htm medicap pharmacy grand forks [url=http://fdaapproved.co.uk/products/rhinocort.htm]rhinocort[/url]

April 23, 2013 2:39 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

This program is intended to recover lost passwords for RAR/WinRAR archives of versions 2.
xx and 3.xx. http://www.winrarpasswordremover.tk/ The free professional solution
for recovering lost passwords to RAR and WinRAR archives.


I am extremely impressed together with your writing abilities as well
as with the structure in your weblog. Is that this
a paid theme or did you modify it yourself? Either way keep up the nice quality writing, it's uncommon to peer a great blog like this one today..

June 03, 2013 1:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Free PDF Password Remover Tools http://www.
pdfpasswordremover.tk - PDF Unlocker - Unlock Any Secured PDF File For Free.
The best PDF Password Removal Software For Free Download

Magnificent web site. A lot of useful info here. I'm sending it to a few friends ans also sharing in delicious. And obviously, thanks in your effort!

June 03, 2013 10:14 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

If you want a Premium Minecraft Account check
out this generator. With it you can generate a unique Minecraft Premium Account which no
one else has! You can Download the Free Premium Minecraft Account Generator http:
//www.MinecraftDownload4Free.tk

Link exchange is nothing else but it is simply placing the other person's web site link on your page at proper place and other person will also do similar in support of you.

Visit my web blog: minecraft beta

June 03, 2013 11:11 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

This program is intended to recover lost passwords for RAR/WinRAR archives of
versions 2.xx and 3.xx. http://www.passwordrecoveryforrar.
tk The free professional solution for recovering lost passwords to RAR and
WinRAR archives.

It's truly very complex in this full of activity life to listen news on Television, so I just use world wide web for that reason, and get the latest news.

Feel free to surf to my site: password rar Recovery

June 04, 2013 8:11 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Free Windows password reset Software
- http://www.windowspasswordrecovery.tk - For Windows8, Windows 7,
Vista, XP, Windows 2000, Windows Server 2003 and 2008 and
NT passwords - Easy Free Password Recovery Software - Crack Windows Passwords

It's remarkable designed for me to have a web page, which is valuable in favor of my know-how. thanks admin

June 04, 2013 3:03 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

This program is intended to recover lost passwords for RAR/WinRAR archives of
versions 2.xx and 3.xx. http://www.winrarpasswordcracker.com The
free professional solution for recovering lost passwords to RAR and WinRAR archives.


Its not my first time to visit this website, i am browsing this web page dailly and take fastidious facts from here every day.

June 05, 2013 1:37 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

We're a group of volunteers and starting a new scheme in our community. Your website provided us with valuable information to work on. You've done a formidable job
and our entire community will be thankful to you.

my web site - hack twitter

June 05, 2013 2:11 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Get the ultimate Dragonvale Breeding Guide Fore Free.
Generate unlimited Dragonvale gems and breed all secret dragons http:
//www.dragonvale-cheats.tk/ . Inclusive the Dragonvale Sandbox Tools and the Dragonvale Breeding Simulator !


Greetings! I've been following your site for a while now and finally got the bravery to go ahead and give you a shout out from Atascocita Tx! Just wanted to say keep up the good job!

June 05, 2013 7:28 PM  
Blogger Unknown said...

Nice Post Love Reading Its

online silagra

Generic Viagra

December 17, 2013 9:39 PM  
Blogger oakleyses said...

louis vuitton outlet online, nike air max, michael kors outlet online, longchamp outlet online, kate spade handbags, jordan shoes, true religion outlet, michael kors outlet online, gucci handbags, nike air max, coach purses, coach outlet, polo ralph lauren outlet, tory burch outlet, true religion, oakley sunglasses, oakley vault, kate spade outlet online, chanel handbags, tiffany jewelry, ray ban outlet, michael kors outlet online, coach outlet, ray ban sunglasses, christian louboutin shoes, prada outlet, longchamp handbags, louis vuitton handbags, prada handbags, nike free, longchamp outlet, tiffany and co jewelry, polo ralph lauren, louis vuitton outlet, christian louboutin outlet, michael kors outlet online, burberry outlet online, louis vuitton, burberry outlet online, coach outlet store online, red bottom shoes, nike shoes, cheap oakley sunglasses, christian louboutin, michael kors outlet, louis vuitton outlet, michael kors outlet store

November 13, 2014 6:32 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

vapor cigarette, e cig reviews, electronic cigarette, smokeless cigarettes, ecigarette, e cigarette

November 27, 2014 12:50 PM  
Anonymous Obat Herbal Radang Selaput Dada said...


Thank you, the article is very petrifying

Tips Paling Ampuh Untuk Pengobatan Meningitis
Tips Untuk Menormalkan Kanker Kelenjar Getah Bening
Cara Mengobati Anyang-anyangan
Obat Cedera Patah Tulang
Obat Herbal Aneurisma Aorta Perut

March 01, 2019 11:06 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home